<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: View PDF Files with PDF-XChange Viewer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whoismadhur.com/2008/11/12/view-pdf-files-with-pdf-xchange-viewer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whoismadhur.com/2008/11/12/view-pdf-files-with-pdf-xchange-viewer/</link>
	<description>Technology, Software Reviews, Tutorials, Vista Tips, Windows Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:53:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valery</title>
		<link>http://www.whoismadhur.com/2008/11/12/view-pdf-files-with-pdf-xchange-viewer/comment-page-1/#comment-263026</link>
		<dc:creator>Valery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 21:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whoismadhur.com/2008/11/12/view-pdf-files-with-pdf-xchange-viewer/#comment-263026</guid>
		<description>Today PDF-XChange doesn&#039;t use much more RAM. If your PC has lots of memory it can be used to cache pages and make the viewer display pages faster. The viewer should release memory if other applications request. Scrolling and zooming large documents the action is smooth and almost instantaneous. In Foxit Reader there is a noticeable jerkiness.  PDF-XChange now uses less memory on a huge document than earlier versions.
By default, PDF-XChange will use a maximum of 25% of available memory. Users can change this in Preferences, Performance to between 10% and 75%.
If you want to use other applications and wish to keep PDF-XChange open, you can minimise it. Memory use will drop below 2 Mbytes.
You can customize User Interface Appearance yourself - you can change colour, fonts or main background according to your style and mood.
You can close even a single opened tab without closing the Viewer itself. I love PDF-XChange much more others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today PDF-XChange doesn&#8217;t use much more RAM. If your PC has lots of memory it can be used to cache pages and make the viewer display pages faster. The viewer should release memory if other applications request. Scrolling and zooming large documents the action is smooth and almost instantaneous. In Foxit Reader there is a noticeable jerkiness.  PDF-XChange now uses less memory on a huge document than earlier versions.<br />
By default, PDF-XChange will use a maximum of 25% of available memory. Users can change this in Preferences, Performance to between 10% and 75%.<br />
If you want to use other applications and wish to keep PDF-XChange open, you can minimise it. Memory use will drop below 2 Mbytes.<br />
You can customize User Interface Appearance yourself &#8211; you can change colour, fonts or main background according to your style and mood.<br />
You can close even a single opened tab without closing the Viewer itself. I love PDF-XChange much more others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alberto Alencar</title>
		<link>http://www.whoismadhur.com/2008/11/12/view-pdf-files-with-pdf-xchange-viewer/comment-page-1/#comment-230904</link>
		<dc:creator>Alberto Alencar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 13:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whoismadhur.com/2008/11/12/view-pdf-files-with-pdf-xchange-viewer/#comment-230904</guid>
		<description>After searching de internet for a long time and after testing several free (not free-trial) PDF-reader applications that would allow me to insert comments / annotations / bookmarks I found PDF-XChange Viewer the best of all in this category !!!

That is the best free (really free) application that allows someone to insert notes while reading a PDF file.

Congratulations to the Tracker Software corporation for this development! Really wonderful! I will recommend it to my friends.

Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After searching de internet for a long time and after testing several free (not free-trial) PDF-reader applications that would allow me to insert comments / annotations / bookmarks I found PDF-XChange Viewer the best of all in this category !!!</p>
<p>That is the best free (really free) application that allows someone to insert notes while reading a PDF file.</p>
<p>Congratulations to the Tracker Software corporation for this development! Really wonderful! I will recommend it to my friends.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demian</title>
		<link>http://www.whoismadhur.com/2008/11/12/view-pdf-files-with-pdf-xchange-viewer/comment-page-1/#comment-185146</link>
		<dc:creator>Demian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 21:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whoismadhur.com/2008/11/12/view-pdf-files-with-pdf-xchange-viewer/#comment-185146</guid>
		<description>I used the same pdf file (31 MB) to compare Adobe Reader 9, Foxit 1.3, and PDF-XChange 2.0.

Start: The three programs started quickly--it didn&#039;t take more time for Adobe Reader 9 to start (AcroRd32.exe wasn&#039;t in RAM).

Font quality: Adobe Reader and Foxit (&quot;... optimized for LCD screen&quot; checked) were better than PDF-XChange.

Speed: Adobe Reader and Foxit displayed the pictures instantly. PDF-XChange seemed to struggle to display the same pictures (it took a couple of seconds).

RAM: Foxit was the best; Adobe Reader and PDF-XChange used more RAM.

Footprint on disk:
- Adobe Reader: Bloatware;
- PDF-Change: Fatty;
- Foxit: lean.

My version of Foxit is an old one and it doesn&#039;t always display pdf files correctly. PDF-XChange is inferior to both Foxit and Acrobat Reader when it comes to viewing files.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used the same pdf file (31 MB) to compare Adobe Reader 9, Foxit 1.3, and PDF-XChange 2.0.</p>
<p>Start: The three programs started quickly&#8211;it didn&#8217;t take more time for Adobe Reader 9 to start (AcroRd32.exe wasn&#8217;t in RAM).</p>
<p>Font quality: Adobe Reader and Foxit (&#8220;&#8230; optimized for LCD screen&#8221; checked) were better than PDF-XChange.</p>
<p>Speed: Adobe Reader and Foxit displayed the pictures instantly. PDF-XChange seemed to struggle to display the same pictures (it took a couple of seconds).</p>
<p>RAM: Foxit was the best; Adobe Reader and PDF-XChange used more RAM.</p>
<p>Footprint on disk:<br />
- Adobe Reader: Bloatware;<br />
- PDF-Change: Fatty;<br />
- Foxit: lean.</p>
<p>My version of Foxit is an old one and it doesn&#8217;t always display pdf files correctly. PDF-XChange is inferior to both Foxit and Acrobat Reader when it comes to viewing files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 4/14 queries in 0.014 seconds using disk

Served from: www.whoismadhur.com @ 2012-02-10 08:19:42 -->
